Campaign Spending Limits, Incumbent Spending, and Election Outcomes
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study the impact of campaign spending limits for candidates in Canadian federal elections. We first demonstrate that spending limits are binding mostly for incumbent candidates. We then use this information to produce endogeneity-corrected estimates for the impact of incumbent spending on electoral vote shares. Furthermore, we examine the impact of spending limits on broader measures of electoral outcomes, finding that larger limits lead to less close elections, fewer candidates, and lower voter turnout. Milligan is also affiliated with the NBER. We thank two anonymous referees, the editor, and participants at the CEA conference, the WEA conference, and the UBC empirical lunch seminar for comments. Funding from SSHRC is gratefully acknowledged. Email:[email protected]
منابع مشابه
The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending
A puzzle in research on campaign spending is that while expenditure is positively related to votes won, this effect is far more strongly, or even exclusively, enjoyed by challengers rather than by incumbents. We unearth a new explanation for the puzzle, focusing on the hidden, yet variable, campaign value of office perquisites which incumbents deploy in their campaigns to win votes. When these ...
متن کاملFor a Few
Although perceived by candidates and parties as important in affecting political outcomes, the link between spending and success in multicandidate, multiparty election campaigns remains unproven. Not only are there relatively few studies of campaign spending effects in multiparty systems, there are none examining the effect under the Single Transferable Vote (STV) electoral system. Our study ex...
متن کاملCaps on
The cost of political campaigns in the U.S. has risen substantially in recent years. For example, real spending on congressional election campaigns doubled between 1976 and 1992 (Steven D. Levitt [1995]). There are many reasons why increased campaign spending might be socially harmful. First, increased spending means increased fund-raising, which may keep politicians from their legislative duti...
متن کاملDoes Campaign Spending Work? Field Experiments Provide Evidence and Suggest New Theory
This article reports the results of several field experiments designed to measure campaign effects in partisan contests. The findings suggest incumbent campaigns failed to increase incumbent vote share, whereas the challenger campaign was effective. To understand these and other results, the incumbent’s optimal spending strategy was analyzed theoretically. The analysis reveals that if incumbent...
متن کاملA Fistful of Euros: Incumbent and Challenger Campaign Spending Effects under the Single-transferable Vote Electoral System
Positive effects of campaign spending on electoral outcomes have been found in several comparative, multiparty contexts (e.g. Britain, France, Japan, and Australia) but very few of these systems use proportional representation (PR). If positive effects from spending are robust, however, then we would also expect to find that they generalize to systems using more proportional rules. Our study ex...
متن کامل